Comparator
Škoda Kodiaq vs GWM Tank 300 — Side by side
Detailed face-off between the Škoda Kodiaq and the GWM Tank 300: price, full specs, equipment, pros and watch-outs. Updated 2026.
↔ SwapAt a glance
Both models share a near-identical entry price (MAD 449,000 vs MAD 449,000).
Editorial verdict
Which should you pick?
Loading comparison…
Spec sheet comparison
| — | Škoda Kodiaq | GWM Tank 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Škoda | GWM |
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Fuel | Diesel | Petrol |
| Gearbox | Auto. dual-clutch | Automatic |
| Power | 200 ch | 220 ch |
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km | 9.8 L/100 km |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Entry price | MAD 449,000 | MAD 449,000 |
| Top trim price | MAD 569,000 | MAD 549,000 |
Pros and watch-outs
ŠkodaKodiaq
Pros
- Real 7-seat — 3rd row fits two adults up to 1.75 m
- 2.0 TDI 200 hp 4×4 available — rare in segment in Morocco
- 4.76 m format — 845 L boot (5 seats) / 281 L (7 seats) / 2,105 L (seats folded)
- Price 12-15% lower than equivalent VW Tayron
- Standard panoramic sunroof from Selection
Watch-outs
- No hybrid gasoline or PHEV version in the MA catalogue in 2026
- Sportline / L&K trim passes 550k with options
- TSI 204 hp consumption ~9 L/100 km in real motorway cycle (vs 6.4 TDI)
GWMTank 300
Pros
- Three lockable differentials (front/centre/rear) — Wrangler Rubicon configuration at half the price
- Committed neo-retro design, immediately identifiable — a successful anti-crossover
- 355 hp / 648 Nm HEV version — a serious hybrid 4x4, unique case in segment
- Body-on-frame ladder chassis + solid rear axle — genuine off-road robustness
Watch-outs
- Residual value to validate — the Wrangler cult protects depreciation, GWM is still building that reputation
- Specialist off-road network (preparers, 4x4 garages) still dominated by Jeep / Toyota in Morocco
- High turbo-petrol consumption in intensive off-road use (11-13 L / 100 km real-world)
Go further
ŠkodaKodiaq
GWMTank 300
Frequently asked — Škoda Kodiaq vs GWM Tank 300
Škoda Kodiaq or GWM Tank 300: which to pick in Morocco 2026?
It depends on your profile. If your top criterion is overall budget, look at the GWM Tank 300 (entry MAD 449,000). If you prioritise the engine or standard equipment, compare the spec sheet above line by line. For purely urban use in Morocco, fuel consumption and exterior size matter more than power; for long Casa-Tanger or Casa-Marrakech trips, power and motorway comfort become decisive.
What's the price gap between the Škoda Kodiaq and the GWM Tank 300?
The Škoda Kodiaq starts at MAD 449,000 versus MAD 449,000 for the GWM Tank 300, a 0% gap at entry. On top trims, the gap may close or invert — check each model's detailed page for the exact figure on the trim you're considering.
Which one holds value better when sold used?
In Morocco, Japanese and German C-SUVs (Toyota RAV4, VW Tiguan) typically retain 65-70% of their new price at 3 years, ahead of Chinese brands and newer SUVs that plateau around 55-60%. For an exact figure on your model, run the estimator at the top of each model page — it computes median + p25-p75 range based on the year and mileage you enter.
Where can the Škoda Kodiaq and GWM Tank 300 be test-driven in Morocco?
Both models are sold through their importers' official dealer networks in Morocco. For the latest list with addresses and phone numbers, see each model's /neuf/ page — every page lists the official importer and helps you find the nearest dealer to your city.